Duelbits Withdrawal Problems? Not Paying Out, Blocked Accounts and Refund Options
Licence status, what the record shows and the routes open to players anywhere, with sources. A listing is a record, not an allegation of wrongdoing.
Written by Jake Thomas, Co-founder and Director. Clinton & Co Advisors is not a law firm. Last checked 6 September 2026.
If Duelbits is not paying out, has frozen your account or has removed your winnings, this page sets out what the operator's own terms allow, what the public record shows and the recovery routes open to players anywhere. The duelbits.com footer, read live on 6 September 2026, names Liquid Entertainment N.V., Curacao company 153298, and quotes licence number 365/JAZ; that number is not a row on the Curacao Gaming Authority's online register (edition 3 September 2026). The register does carry a row for Liquid Entertainment N.V. against licence OGL/2024/1507/0838, status Assessment in progress, but nothing published by the operator or the regulator ties that row to duelbits.com. duelbits.io, the site blocked visitors are redirected to, is a different company on an Anjouan licence, so which domain you played on decides who you contracted with. If you have lost money to Duelbits, or lost a lot of money there, the sections below cover withdrawal delays, blocked accounts, confiscated winnings, silence, large balances and where to complain.
- Entity
- Not confirmed against the Curacao Gaming Authority register. Duelbits' own footer, read live at https://duelbits.com/en on 6 September 2026, names Liquid Entertainment N.V.
- Registration number
- 153298
- Licence number
- None stated
- Regulator
- Curacao Gaming Authority (CGA)
- Status
- Listed
- Date checked
- 6 September 2026
- Register
- Curaçao Gaming Authority register (edition of 16 September 2026)
Licence status: could not be validated against the Curaçao Gaming Authority register on 6 September 2026
Not confirmed against the Curacao Gaming Authority register. Duelbits' own footer, read live at https://duelbits.com/en on 6 September 2026, names Liquid Entertainment N.V. (Curacao reg. 153298) of Zuikertuintjeweg z/n (Zuikertuin Tower), Willemstad, and Herpestidae Services Limited (Cyprus reg. HE 410029) of 1 Avlonos, Maria House, Nicosia, described as a wholly owned subsidiary providing management, payment and support services, as the parties behind the site. The footer states the site is licensed by the Government of Curacao and quotes the number 365/JAZ, which is not a row on the Curacao Gaming Authority's v2 online register. The register does carry a row for Liquid Entertainment N.V. against licence OGL/2024/1507/0838, status Assessment in progress, but nothing published ties that specific row to duelbits.com, so the two facts are recorded here rather than merged.
Licence status: could not be validated against the Curacao Gaming Authority (CGA) register on 6 September 2026.
Our free licence checker covers this and every other operator we hold a file on.
Who operates Duelbits
The duelbits.com footer, read live at https://duelbits.com/en on 6 September 2026, states: 'duelbits.com is a brand name of Liquid Entertainment N.V. Reg No 153298, having its registered address at Zuikertuintjeweg z/n (Zuikertuin Tower), Willemstad, Curaçao, licensed to conduct online gaming operations by the Government of Curacao.' The same footer quotes a licence number, 365/JAZ, and names Herpestidae Services Limited (Reg No. HE 410029, 1 Avlonos, Maria House, Nicosia, 1075 Cyprus) as a wholly owned subsidiary of Liquid Entertainment N.V. providing management, payment and support services related to the site.
The Curacao Gaming Authority's v2 online register, edition 3 September 2026, carries one row for Liquid Entertainment N.V.: licence OGL/2024/1507/0838, status Assessment in progress. That number does not match the 365/JAZ the live footer quotes, and nothing published on the register or the site ties this specific row to duelbits.com rather than to some other product the same entity might run, so the row is recorded here without being merged into duelbits.com's licence claim. A read of duelbits.com's own terms of service in a previous session (printed revision 2 September 2025, read 4 September 2026) had stated in clause 1 that the site operates under licence OGL/2024/1507/0838, the same number as the register row, which does not agree with the number the live footer states this wave. Duelbits' own published pages therefore do not agree with each other on the licence number, and the number that is on the register cannot be confirmed as duelbits.com's.
Because of that mismatch, the licence claim could not be validated against the register on 6 September 2026. This is a downgrade from a previous verified reading of this record; it follows directly from the live footer read and is not a claim that Duelbits holds no licence at all, only that the number it currently publishes does not correspond to a register entry that can be confirmed as its own. duelbits.io, a separate domain the site's translation strings redirect blocked-region visitors to, is run by a different company, Elevated Entertainment Ltd (Anjouan reg. 16101), under Anjouan licence ALSI-112310013-FI5; that fact was recorded in a previous session and was not re-read this wave. casino.guru, AskGamblers and LCB all date the Duelbits brand to 2020.
What the terms allow Duelbits to do
This section reflects a previous read of the duelbits.com terms of service (printed revision 2 September 2025, read 4 September 2026). This wave's attempt to re-fetch the live terms page on 6 September 2026 returned a Cloudflare bot-check page (HTTP 403, Ray ID a36967a7dbe91893), and the Wayback Machine snapshot of the promotion terms page was an application error page rather than usable text, so none of the following could be re-confirmed this wave; it is carried forward rather than re-verified.
Clause 6.1 allowed the operator to request government identification, proof of residence, proof of ownership of the payment method or crypto wallet, and source of wealth or source of funds documentation from high volume players, at any time. Clause 6.2 said enhanced verification was generally performed once cumulative withdrawal or deposit activity reached XCG 4,000, about EUR 2,000 or roughly £1,700 or $2,200, while reserving the right to start those procedures at any time and at any threshold the company considered necessary. Clause 5.3 required ten per cent of a deposit to be wagered before a withdrawal could be initiated, and the AML and KYC page allowed a balance to be frozen until that requirement was met and disclaimed responsibility for withdrawal delays caused by KYC checks. Clause 7.3 made processing times indicative only and disclaimed liability for delays.
Several clauses allowed winnings to be voided or confiscated. Clause 3.3 treated VPN or proxy use to bypass the prohibited jurisdictions list as a material breach and reserved the right to freeze accounts and confiscate winnings from that access. Clause 4.1 blocked duplicate accounts and voided their credits and winnings. Clause 8.3 allowed winnings to be voided for minimal risk wagering or bonus arbitrage, clause 9.2 voided everything arising from a malfunction or human error with liability limited to the stake, and clause 13.4 made professional play, syndicate betting or the use of automated tools grounds for closure and forfeiture of the balance. Clause 10.2 classed an account dormant after twelve months, with forfeiture said not to depend on the player receiving notice.
Two further clauses shaped any recovery route. Clause 11.2 limited liability on a wager dispute to the return of the stake, on an account dispute to deposits minus withdrawals at the time of the incident, and otherwise to the total deposited in the preceding six months. Clause 13.2 required a claim to be filed within one year of arising, clause 13.1 waived class actions, and clause 12.3 put governing law and exclusive jurisdiction in Curacao. Clause 12.2 pointed escalation to a Player Complaints Policy Guidelines procedure and then to the Curacao Gaming Authority, but no such complaints document sat in the operator's published set as previously read, which ran to the terms, promotion terms, privacy, refund, AML, security, responsible gambling, referral and affiliate documents and a peer to peer policy.
Withdrawal delayed or refused
Where a Duelbits withdrawal sits pending for days, clause 7.3 of the duelbits.com terms is the clause in point: it makes processing timeframes 'indicative only', allows delays for security reviews, compliance checks or blockchain congestion, and disclaims liability for losses caused by those delays. Before a cash out can be initiated, clause 5.3 requires ten per cent of the deposit to be wagered, and the AML and KYC page allows funds to be frozen until that is met and disclaims responsibility for delays caused by KYC checks. Clause 6.2 puts enhanced verification at cumulative activity of about XCG 4,000 (EUR 2,000, roughly £1,700 or $2,200), then reserves the right to open it at any threshold. No daily, weekly or monthly payout cap is published in the terms and casino.guru records the limits as unlimited. Complaints published on AskGamblers describe a $11,203 (about £8,600) withdrawal left in processing after automated KYC failed, and complaint titles published on casino.guru describe delays disputed at $4,391 (about £3,400) and at 15,000 USDT (about £11,600 / $15,000). Record the request date, the amount and every document you upload, and ask in writing which check the payout is held for.
Account blocked or frozen
Duelbits can close an account under several clauses. Clause 4.1 permits one account per player: where duplicates are opened, all accounts may be blocked or closed and the credits and winnings in the duplicates will be void. Clause 3.3 treats VPN or proxy use to reach the site from a prohibited jurisdiction as a material breach and reserves the right to freeze accounts and confiscate winnings from that access, and the United Kingdom, the United States and Australia all sit on the clause 3.2 list. Clause 13.4 makes professional play, syndicate betting or the use of bots grounds for closure and forfeiture of the balance. Complaints published on AskGamblers describe an account suspended and then permanently closed after a KYC request, with about $18,000 (about £13,900) zeroed and roughly $15,000 (about £11,600) of the player's own deposits said not to have been returned, and verification stuck for five days with $934 (about £720) held. Complaints published on Trustpilot describe a ban within days of a large win with the whole balance retained and only flagged activity given as the reason, and separately describe VIP and lossback promises said not to have been honoured. Ask in writing which clause was applied, and request your transaction history and the balance at closure.
Winnings voided or confiscated
Confiscated winnings at Duelbits are governed by the discretion clauses in the terms. Clause 8.3 reserves the right to void winnings for what it calls minimal risk wagering or bonus arbitrage. Clause 9.2 voids all wagers and winnings arising from a malfunction, software bug or human error, with liability limited to the return of the stake. The Promotion and Bonus Terms allow bonus winnings and the deposit to be confiscated where accounts are connected by location, banking pattern or IP, and state that the operator's decision is final. Clause 10.2 classes an account dormant after twelve months and says the forfeiture that follows does not depend on the player receiving notice, and the responsible gambling page forfeits wagers, reward funds and promotion entries placed during a self-exclusion. Complaint titles published on casino.guru describe winnings confiscated at a disputed EUR 305 (about £260 / $330), winnings not received at a disputed EUR 30,113 (about £25,900 / $32,500) and an account closed at 1,360 USDT (about £1,050 / $1,360), while complaints published on Trustpilot describe an offerwall reward refused on the stated ground of VPN use. A complaint turns on the wording of the confiscation notice and the clause it cites, so where the decision followed a source of funds request, ask for both in writing.
Site not responding or gone dark
Duelbits has not closed. duelbits.com is live, and a CGA certificate read in a previous session (4 September 2026) recorded it as one of three approved domains, with duelbits.net and sportsbits.com. Opened from a blocked location it shows a notice that products and services are not available in that region and redirects to duelbits.io, a different company under a different licence, so a player can end up mid dispute on a site the Curacao licence does not cover. What players report instead is silence. Clause 12.1 names support@duelbits.com as the first step and clause 12.2 points to a Player Complaints Policy Guidelines procedure before escalation to the CGA, yet no such complaints document sat in the operator's published set as read live on 6 September 2026, and the archive of terms versions promised by clause 2.3 was not found there either. Complaints published on Trustpilot describe a leaderboard prize left unpaid after an account was disabled, with support and email contact stopping, and long waits for rakeback under the VIP scheme; Trustpilot also records that the operator replies to 84 per cent of negative reviews. A cash out that goes unanswered is not the same as a site that has closed, and clause 13.2 bars any claim filed more than one year after it arose, so silence runs against a deadline.
What the record shows
Spelinspektionen, the Swedish Gambling Authority, prohibited Liquid Entertainment N.V. from providing gambling in Sweden without the necessary licence, with immediate effect, in decision 25Si1471 of 20 August 2025. The supervisory case concerned duelbits.com: Sweden was preselected as the country and Swedish appeared at registration from a Swedish IP address, the site was marketed to Swedish consumers through affiliate sites, content creators, the Kick streaming platform and Google search advertising, and nothing showed that Swedish consumers were prevented from registering. The decision records the site as owned and operated by Liquid Entertainment N.V., 153298, and cites the Swedish Gambling Act (spellagen 2018:1138).
SourceIs Duelbits legit?
The honest answer to "is it legit" has parts. Duelbits claims a Curaçao licence that could not be validated against the register. The record above holds 1 documented item for Duelbits, sourced and attributed. With no UK Gambling Commission licence recorded for it, GamStop does not cover it and no UK adjudicator can hear a dispute about it, which counts for more than any star rating once money is stuck. Holding a licence is no assurance that players are treated fairly. A Curaçao licence number can be checked against the CGA's official register using our free licence checker.
Complaints about Duelbits
None of the following was re-read this wave; it carries forward attributed player reports gathered in a previous session (4 September 2026) and is included for context on top of the licence position above, which is the current wave's finding.
casino.guru gave Duelbits a Safety Index of 8.2, described as High, rated the terms Fair with no issues found, and listed no blacklist entry. The same page recorded 72 complaints in total, of which 1 was open, 2 unresolved, 22 resolved and 47 rejected, with complaint titles describing an account closed and winnings confiscated at a disputed EUR 305 (about £260 / $330), a withdrawal significantly delayed at a disputed $4,391 (about £3,400), winnings not received at a disputed EUR 30,113 (about £25,900 / $32,500), a withdrawal delayed for internal review at 15,000 USDT (about £11,600 / $15,000), an account closed with no explanation given at 1,360 USDT (about £1,050 / $1,360), and further delayed withdrawals at $449 (about £350), 100 USDT (about £77 / $100) and EUR 21 (about £18 / $23). Trustpilot showed a TrustScore of 3.0 out of 5 from 340 reviews, 51 per cent five star against 36 per cent one star, with the operator replying to 84 per cent of negative reviews.
Complaints published on Trustpilot for duelbits.com described an account banned within days of a large win with the whole balance, including the player's own deposits, retained and only flagged activity given as the reason and no route of appeal offered; a leaderboard prize said to be unpaid after the account was disabled, with support and email contact stopping; VIP and lossback promises said not to be honoured and long waits for rakeback; rakeback said to be forfeited when a short self-exclusion was requested; a card deposit not credited for several days and refunded only by the player's bank; and an offerwall reward refused on the stated ground of VPN use that the reviewer said the operator's own support had not detected.
AskGamblers listed 10 complaints with an average response time of three days alongside a player rating of 7.8 out of 10 from 23 reviews. Complaints published there described a withdrawal of $11,203 (about £8,600) left in processing after a winning session, with automated KYC level 2 failing and a manual review the player said did not conclude; verification stuck for five days through the operator's identity provider with a balance of $934 (about £720) held; an account suspended and then permanently closed after a KYC request, with a balance of about $18,000 (about £13,900) zeroed and roughly $15,000 (about £11,600) of the player's own deposits said not to have been returned; and a withdrawal of $253,290 (about £195,000) in ETH held in processing while more than thirty documents, including certified incorporation records, share registers and personal identity documents, were supplied. Latest Casino Bonuses showed a member rating of 2.5 out of 5 from seven votes and listed among the disadvantages the operator's right to suspend or close an account at any time without prior notice or liability. All of the above are attributed player reports, not findings by any regulator.
A complaint about Duelbits should go to Duelbits itself first, in writing, through the complaints channel it publishes or its support address where it publishes none, with every reply kept. If Duelbits does not resolve it, escalation points at Curacao Gaming Authority (CGA), and in practice the pressure comes from the evidence your own records support. The sequence is set out in how to escalate a casino complaint.
What the licence requires
Duelbits's licence position could not be validated against the register, and no UK Gambling Commission licence is recorded for it, so GamStop and the UK dispute-resolution framework do not apply. Read more on how Curaçao casino law works.
Since the National Ordinance on Games of Chance (the LOK) came into force on 24 December 2024, Curaçao licences are issued directly by the Curaçao Gaming Authority, which requires licensees to verify player identity, operate responsible-gaming measures and publish a complaints procedure. What it lacks is the UK layer: no GamStop participation, no Gambling Commission oversight and no UK dispute-resolution requirement. That gap changes where the pressure points are; it does not remove them.
The Curaçao Gaming Authority accepts player complaints against its licensees. Quote the licence number on file, and run the operator's own published complaints procedure first.
If you are trying to recover money
Because no licence this file could confirm now stands behind Duelbits, there is no adjudicator anywhere that can order a refund, so recovery runs as a claim built on the Duelbits terms as they stood when you played and on the evidence your own records support, taken forward with a regulated legal partner where they support it. Preserve your account evidence first, then see how gambling-loss recovery works, the evidence you need to recover losses, and how to escalate a casino complaint.
Search the Curaçao enforcement register for Duelbits first, because a published action against the licence is a fact your complaint can cite.
Two guides carry the detail for a Curaçao brand like Duelbits. Getting your money back from a Curaçao casino sets out the complaint order and what the regulator can realistically do about Duelbits. Where you had self-excluded with Duelbits and it kept taking deposits, read what a failed self-exclusion is worth. The free complaint route finder maps the order for you.
If the amount is large
A five or six figure balance at Duelbits meets three clauses at once. Clause 6.1 lets the operator require source of wealth and source of funds documentation from high volume players at any time, and clause 6.2 lets it open enhanced verification at any threshold it chooses, so a source of funds request after a large win falls within the discretion those clauses give. What can be tested is whether it was raised only after the win, whether the documents demanded were proportionate, and whether the account was then closed with the balance held. Complaints published on AskGamblers describe a withdrawal of $253,290 (about £195,000) in ETH left in processing while more than thirty documents, including incorporation records and share registers, were supplied. Clause 11.2 then decides what a dispute is worth: on a wager dispute liability is limited to the return of the stake, on an account dispute to deposits minus withdrawals at the time of the incident, and otherwise to the total deposited in the preceding six months, so a £50,000 / $65,000 balance built from winnings is not the same figure as the recoverable one. No withdrawal ceiling is published, and a VIP host who stops replying after the payout request should be documented rather than chased. Clause 13.2 gives one year to bring a claim and clause 13.1 waives class actions, while nothing in the terms forbids assigning a claim to a third party. The routing section below sets out where the complaint goes.
Where you are playing from
Four steps, in order, and they are the same wherever in the world you were playing from, because they attach to the Duelbits Curaçao licence. Complain in writing to Duelbits within six months of the incident (LOK Article 5.3: free, acknowledged within a week, answered by Duelbits within four weeks, extendable once by four weeks). Escalate to alternative dispute resolution, which the LOK requires a licensee to offer at its own expense and which the Authority requires to be run by a provider holding its certification, and which the Authority expects to run no longer than 90 days from the referral; a licensee that has engaged no certified provider is in breach of that requirement rather than exempt from it. Send a copy of the complaint to complaints@cga.cw, knowing the Curaçao Gaming Authority cannot mediate or order compensation but does use complaints to supervise licensees such as Duelbits. Then the Curaçao courts, which Article 5.5 requires a licensee to nominate in its gaming agreement and where a player’s claim against a licensee such as Duelbits is enforceable.
The Duelbits licence could not be validated against the Curacao Gaming Authority (CGA) register, so treat the licence route as conditional on that licence existing; the domestic angles below stand either way.
If you are in the United States
The United States is on the clause 3.2 prohibited list and on the separate list published on the AML and KYC page, and clause 3.3 allows an account reached through a VPN from a prohibited jurisdiction to be frozen and the winnings from that access confiscated. No United States regulator or court item naming Duelbits, Liquid Entertainment N.V. or Elevated Entertainment Ltd is recorded in this file; not searched this wave, so the route runs through the operator's own procedure and then the Curacao licence, and that is the duelbits.com route: a player redirected to duelbits.io is contracting with Elevated Entertainment Ltd under Anjouan licence ALSI-112310013-FI5, whose terms put governing law and exclusive jurisdiction in Anjouan.
If you are in the EU
Sweden is the one European country with a decision on the record: on 20 August 2025 Spelinspektionen prohibited Liquid Entertainment N.V. from providing gambling in Sweden without the necessary licence, with immediate effect, in decision 25Si1471, in a supervisory case that concerned duelbits.com. Belgium, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain are on the duelbits.com clause 3.2 list while other member states are not, the AML and KYC page publishes a different list again, adding Serbia and Slovakia and dropping Belgium, Italy and Spain, and the duelbits.io banned regions clause names Austria and Croatia as well as France, the Netherlands and Spain, so an Austrian or Croatian player is banned on the site blocked visitors are redirected to. No Dutch decision is recorded here; the Kansspelautoriteit archive was not searched for this record, so nothing follows from its absence.
If you are in Canada or Australia
Australia is prohibited in both companies' terms, under clause 3.2 on duelbits.com and in the banned regions clause on duelbits.io, so clause 3.3 applies to an Australian account. No ACMA blocking order or formal warning naming Duelbits or Liquid Entertainment N.V. is recorded in this file; the ACMA site was not searched for this record, so that is an absence of a recorded item rather than a cleared search. Canada is restricted in neither set of terms and casino.guru lists Interac e-Transfer among the deposit methods, so a Canadian player's route is the Curacao one described above.
If you are in the UK
The United Kingdom is named as prohibited in clause 3.2, on the AML and KYC page and in the duelbits.io banned regions clause. There is no UK Gambling Commission licence: a register search for Liquid Entertainment, read 4 September 2026 and not re-read this wave, returned no result, and the only duelbits entry is the former duelbits.co.uk domain declared by TGP Europe Limited, whose Great Britain licences were surrendered on 15 May 2025. GamStop, IBAS and the Commission therefore play no part. That route applies to an account on duelbits.com: the operator's clause 12.1 procedure, then the Curacao Gaming Authority, quoting the footer's own licence number, 365/JAZ, since that number rather than any confirmed register row is what duelbits.com publishes, then the Curacao courts under clause 12.3. A visitor blocked from duelbits.com is redirected to duelbits.io, which is operated by Elevated Entertainment Ltd under Anjouan licence ALSI-112310013-FI5 and whose terms put governing law and exclusive jurisdiction in Anjouan, so check which domain your account and your deposits sit on: the Curacao route does not reach a duelbits.io account.
Sources
- duelbits.com: Site footer read live 6 September 2026: 'duelbits.com is a brand name of Liquid Entertainment N.V. Reg No 153298, having its registered address at Zuikertuintjeweg z/n (Zuikertuin Tower), Willemstad, Curaçao, licensed to conduct online gaming operations by the Government of Curacao', quoting licence number 365/JAZ; the footer also names Herpestidae Services Limited (Reg No. HE 410029, 1 Avlonos, Maria House, Nicosia, 1075 Cyprus) as a wholly owned subsidiary providing management, payment and support services
- duelbits.com: Attempted fetch 6 September 2026 returned HTTP 403 (Cloudflare bot-check challenge page, Ray ID a36967a7dbe91893); the Wayback Machine snapshot of the same URL (20260603154832) also returned an application error page rather than usable terms text, so the promotion terms could not be read this wave (live fetch attempted 6 September 2026; Wayback snapshot of 3 June 2026)
- gamingcontrol.spin-cdn.com: Read 6 September 2026: v2 dataset row OGL/2024/1507/0838, Liquid Entertainment N.V., Assessment in progress
- duelbits.com: Previously recorded, not re-read this wave (read 4 September 2026, printed revision 2 September 2025): clause 1 (owned and operated by Liquid Entertainment N.V., Curacao company 153298, stated there as licensed under OGL/2024/1507/0838, registered office Pos Cabai Office Park 5), clauses 3.1 to 3.3 (minors, prohibited jurisdictions including the United Kingdom, VPN confiscation), 4.1 (one account), 5.1 and 5.3 (no interest, ten per cent wagering), 6.1 to 6.3 (KYC, source of wealth, the XCG 4,000 threshold), 7.1 to 7.3 (withdrawal mechanics), 8.3 (minimal risk wagering), 9.2 (malfunction voids), 10.2 (dormancy), 11.2 (liability caps), 12.1 to 12.3 (complaints, CGA escalation, Curacao law and courts), 13.1 to 13.4 (class action waiver, one year limitation), 14.3 (English version governs). This clause 1 licence number claim (OGL/2024/1507/0838) is what the live footer read this wave (365/JAZ) now appears to contradict; the discrepancy is why the record is unverified
- cert.cga.cw: Previously recorded, not re-read this wave (read 4 September 2026): CGA certificate B2C for Liquid Entertainment N.V., company number 153298, showing licence OGL/2024/1507/0838 as granted 1 November 2024 for domains duelbits.com, duelbits.net and sportsbits.com; no status word printed on the certificate itself
- duelbits.io: Previously recorded, not re-read this wave (read 4 September 2026): duelbits.io footer named Elevated Entertainment Ltd (Reg. No. 16101), Anjouan, as operator; region blocked notice shown from this location
- anjouangaming.com: Previously recorded, not re-read this wave (read 4 September 2026): Elevated Entertainment Ltd, status Valid, licence ALSI-112310013-FI5, domain duelbits.io
- gamblingcommission.gov.uk: Previously recorded, not re-read this wave (read 4 September 2026): no results for Liquid Entertainment; a search for duelbits returns TGP Europe Limited, account 38898, matched to the domain duelbits.co.uk
- gamblingcommission.gov.uk: Previously recorded, not re-read this wave (read 4 September 2026): TGP Europe Limited, licence 038898-R-319391-020, status Surrendered from 1 November 2014 to 15 May 2025
- spelinspektionen.se: Previously recorded, not re-read this wave (read 4 September 2026): decision 25Si1471, 20 August 2025, prohibiting Liquid Entertainment N.V. from providing gambling in Sweden without a licence, case concerning duelbits.com
- casino.guru: Previously recorded, not re-read this wave (read 4 September 2026): Safety Index 8.2 (High), owner Liquid Entertainment N.V., established 2020, 72 complaints in total (1 open, 2 unresolved, 22 resolved, 47 rejected)
- uk.trustpilot.com: Previously recorded, not re-read this wave (read 4 September 2026): TrustScore 3.0 of 5 from 340 reviews, 51 per cent five star against 36 per cent one star
- askgamblers.com: Previously recorded, not re-read this wave (read 4 September 2026): CasinoRank 7.2 of 10, 10 complaints, company named as Liquid Entertainment N.V., established 2020
- lcb.org: Previously recorded, not re-read this wave (read 4 September 2026): member rating 2.5 of 5 from 7 votes, marked NOT ACCEPTED for the United Kingdom
- duelbits.com
- duelbits.com
- api.locize.app
- cert.cga.cw
- duelbits.io
- spelinspektionen.se
- spelinspektionen.se
- gamingcommission.be
- acma.gov.au
The routing section also cites one further source, read 3 September 2026: cga.cw.
How we verified this: the Duelbits file draws on Curacao Gaming Authority (CGA) records, licence registers and attributed player reports, checked as our editorial standards describe.
Common questions about Duelbits
Can I get my money back from Duelbits?
Possibly. No licence this file could confirm now stands behind Duelbits, so there is no regulator or adjudicator anywhere that can order a refund. Recovery instead works through the Duelbits terms as they stood when you played, the evidence your payment history supports, and where appropriate a regulated legal partner. The right route depends on your evidence, and our initial assessment is free and confidential.
Who operates Duelbits, and is it licensed?
Not confirmed against the Curacao Gaming Authority register. Duelbits' own footer, read live at https://duelbits.com/en on 6 September 2026, names Liquid Entertainment N.V. (Curacao reg. 153298) of Zuikertuintjeweg z/n (Zuikertuin Tower), Willemstad, and Herpestidae Services Limited (Cyprus reg. HE 410029) of 1 Avlonos, Maria House, Nicosia, described as a wholly owned subsidiary providing management, payment and support services, as the parties behind the site. The footer states the site is licensed by the Government of Curacao and quotes the number 365/JAZ, which is not a row on the Curacao Gaming Authority's v2 online register. The register does carry a row for Liquid Entertainment N.V. against licence OGL/2024/1507/0838, status Assessment in progress, but nothing published ties that specific row to duelbits.com, so the two facts are recorded here rather than merged. Duelbits's licence position could not be validated against the register check recorded on this file. It is recorded as listed under Curacao Gaming Authority (CGA). The brand has operated since 2020. This licence sits outside GamStop, so a GamStop self-exclusion does not block accounts held under it.
Does Duelbits accept UK players?
Duelbits is not open to UK players on the record on this file. Clause 3.2 of the duelbits.com terms, as read in a previous session (printed revision 2 September 2025, read 4 September 2026), lists the United Kingdom among the prohibited jurisdictions, as does the separate list on the AML and KYC page and the banned regions clause on duelbits.io. Clause 3.3 treats VPN or proxy use to bypass those restrictions as a material breach and reserves the right to freeze accounts and confiscate winnings derived from such access. The live terms page could not be re-read on 6 September 2026 (see What could be read of the terms), so this clause is carried forward from that earlier read rather than re-confirmed. No UK Gambling Commission licence, so no GamStop coverage and no UK dispute route. The licence in force when you played is what shapes the routes open to you.
Is there anything documented on file about Duelbits?
Our research records 1 regulator or court action for Duelbits, with its issuing body and a source you can check. A listing is a record, not proof of wrongdoing, and every case turns on its own evidence.
What should I do if Duelbits will not pay out or has frozen my account?
Preserve the evidence first: screenshot your balance, the stuck withdrawal, chat transcripts and emails, and save the terms as they read today. Then make one formal written complaint and escalate to the right authority or a regulated legal partner. Avoid closing the account or accepting a partial settlement before you have taken advice.
Will Duelbits know I contacted Clinton & Co?
No. Nothing is sent to any operator without your written consent. The first an operator hears of your case is a formal complaint you have approved.
How long does a Duelbits withdrawal take?
The terms name no number of days. Clause 7.3 makes processing timeframes indicative only and allows delays for security reviews, compliance checks or blockchain congestion, and the AML and KYC page says the operator cannot be held responsible for delays caused by KYC checks. Clause 5.3 also requires ten per cent of a deposit to be wagered before a withdrawal can be initiated. Log the date of the payout request and every document you send.
Is there a Duelbits withdrawal limit or minimum?
No daily, weekly or monthly withdrawal cap and no maximum win appears in the duelbits.com terms, and casino.guru records the limits as unlimited with no win limit. No minimum withdrawal figure is published in the terms either. What the terms do impose is clause 5.3's ten per cent wagering requirement, clause 7.1's rule that funds return to the original method or wallet, and clause 7.2's enhanced verification where a wallet is lost or a token delisted.
Does Duelbits require KYC?
Yes. Clause 6.1 allows the operator to request government identification, proof of residence, proof of ownership of the payment method or crypto wallet, and source of wealth or source of funds documentation from high volume players, at any time. Clause 6.2 generally opens enhanced verification at cumulative activity of about XCG 4,000 (roughly £1,700 or $2,200) but reserves the right to act at any threshold. Complaints published on AskGamblers describe verification stuck at the automated stage.
Is duelbits.io the same as duelbits.com?
Same brand, different company. duelbits.com, duelbits.net and sportsbits.com are named on Liquid Entertainment N.V.'s Curacao paperwork, though the licence number the site's own footer publishes (365/JAZ) is not a row on the current Curacao Gaming Authority register. duelbits.io is operated by Elevated Entertainment Ltd, an Anjouan company, under Anjouan licence ALSI-112310013-FI5, with Anjouan law and courts in its terms. Players blocked from the .com site are redirected to the .io site, so check which domain your account and your deposits sit on before you complain.
Why is my Duelbits account suspended?
The terms give several grounds. Clause 4.1 blocks duplicate accounts and voids their winnings, clause 3.3 covers VPN or proxy use from a prohibited jurisdiction, clause 13.4 covers professional play, syndicate betting and bots, and clause 6.1 supports a hold while identity documents are outstanding. Complaints published on Trustpilot and AskGamblers describe suspensions following a KYC request or a large win. Ask in writing which clause was applied and for your transaction history.
Has Duelbits been fined or taken to court?
One regulator decision is on the record. Spelinspektionen prohibited Liquid Entertainment N.V. from providing gambling in Sweden without the necessary licence on 20 August 2025, decision 25Si1471, with immediate effect, in a case concerning duelbits.com. No other regulator item is recorded here. Only the Gambling Commission public register has been searched for this record, on 4 September 2026 and not re-read this wave, and it returned no result for Liquid Entertainment N.V.; the Australian, Belgian, Dutch, Spanish and Ontario archives were not searched, so nothing follows from their absence. Complaints published on review sites are player reports, not regulator findings.
Is Duelbits holding your money?
The sooner the evidence is preserved, the stronger the file. Our initial assessment is free and strictly confidential.
Start Your Claim