Editorial standards.
Every page on this site is prepared by the Clinton & Co Claims Team and checked against primary sources. This page explains how the research is done, how often pages are reviewed, and what happens when we get something wrong.
How operator files are researched
Each entry in our operator directoryis built from primary records, not from affiliate reviews. We check the operator’s licensing claim against the register of the authority it names: the UK Gambling Commission public register for any brand claiming a British licence, the Malta Gaming Authority’s verification service, the Curaçao Gaming Authority’s portal and the Anjouan validator for offshore claims. We read the operator’s own terms and legal footer as they stand on the day we check them, and we record regulator enforcement decisions from the issuing body’s own publications. Where a licence claim cannot be verified first-hand, the page says so rather than repeating a number from a review site.
How player reports are handled
Complaint patterns from platforms such as casino.guru, AskGamblers and Trustpilot appear on our pages as what they are: attributed player reports, not findings of wrongdoing. We label regulator and court decisions as rulings, third-party research as allegations, and we do not present either as the other. A listing in our directory is a record, not an accusation, and pages about operators with nothing documented against them say exactly that.
Who writes the content
All content is prepared and maintained at organisation level by the Clinton & Co Claims Team, the same team that assesses cases, and is checked against the primary sources cited on each page before publication. We do not publish individual bylines. We are not solicitors or a law firm, and nothing on this site is legal advice: where our guides describe legal routes, the underlying legal work is carried out by the regulated legal partners we work with. How a case actually proceeds is set out on how we work.
Review cadence
Articles carry a visible published date and a last-reviewed date, and the same dates are declared in each page’s structured data. Operator files are reviewed as a dataset, and the review date is published in the sitemap whenever the records materially change. Licence positions, regulator actions and brand migrations move quickly in the offshore market, so where an operator’s status changes between reviews, the safest assumption is the one our pages repeat: verify the licence position on the issuing register on the day you rely on it.
Corrections
If anything on this site is wrong, we want to know. Send the page address and the issue to us via the contact page, and include a source if you have one. We check reported errors against primary records, correct promptly where the report stands up, and update the page’s last-reviewed date so the change is visible. Concerns about our service rather than our content are handled under our complaints procedure.