Operator File · Costa Rica

Vave

Licence status, what the record shows and the routes open to players anywhere, with sources. A listing is a record, not an allegation of wrongdoing.


Written by Jake Thomas, Co-founder and Director. Clinton & Co Advisors is not a law firm. Last checked 3 September 2026.

Register check
Entity
Chestoption Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada
Registration number
Not published
Licence number
None stated
Regulator
None recorded
Status
Listed
Date checked
6 September 2026
Register
Curaçao Gaming Authority register (edition of 3 September 2026)

Licence status: could not be validated against the Curaçao Gaming Authority register on 6 September 2026

Chestoption Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada (Costa Rica, cedula 3-102-876612)

Licence status: could not be validated against the register on 6 September 2026.

Our free licence checker covers this and every other operator we hold a file on.

Who operates Vave

Vave is operated by Chestoption Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada, a company registered in Costa Rica under cedula 3-102-876612, according to the operator's own privacy policy, which carries no date. That page names no gaming licence and no regulator. Clinton & Co could not validate a licence for Vave against the Curaçao Gaming Authority register on 6 September 2026.

The ACMA warning

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) issued a formal warning to the operating entity, Chestoption Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada, for providing prohibited interactive gambling services to Australian customers in breach of the Interactive Gambling Act 2001. The warning covered the Vave and Hell Spin brands and was recorded in the ACMA enforcement report covering April to June 2025, dated July 2025. This is a record of an Australian regulator's action, not an allegation by Clinton and Co.

What Vave publishes about its regulatory status

Vave's own privacy policy, which carries no date, names no gaming regulator alongside its Costa Rica company registration. Clinton & Co searched the Curaçao Gaming Authority register (v2 dataset, edition 3 September 2026) on 6 September 2026 for Vave, Chestoption Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada and Chestoption SRL, and found no matching row, so the licence position could not be validated either way.

Linked brand: Hell Spin

The ACMA warning names Hell Spin as a sister brand operated by the same entity, Chestoption Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada, linking the two brands to a single operator. The same corporate background therefore applies across both Vave and Hell Spin.

Is Vave withholding a withdrawal?

The playbook for a stalled Vave payout is in what to do when a casino withholds your winnings. For a substantial sum, whether Vave has voided a win, confiscated a balance or simply stopped releasing a withdrawal, our withheld winnings service covers the evidence that decides these cases and the point at which specialist assessment earns its keep.

What the record shows

Regulator / court actionAustralian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA)· 2025-07 (Apr-Jun 2025 report)

ACMA (Australia) issued a formal warning to operating entity 'Chestoption Sociedad De Responsabilidad Limitada' for providing prohibited interactive gambling services (brands Hell Spin and Vave) to Australian customers, breaching the Interactive Gambling Act 2001.

Source

Is Vave legit?

"Legit" is really three separate questions. Vave claims a Costa Rica licence that could not be validated against the register. 1 documented item sits on the Vave file above, it carrying an issuing body and source. No UK Gambling Commission licence is recorded for it, meaning neither GamStop nor the UK dispute framework reaches it, and that gap matters more than any review score when something goes wrong. No licence anywhere is a promise of fair treatment.

Complaints about Vave

Documented items about Vave appear above with their sources; day-to-day Vave complaints, typically stalled withdrawals, verification loops and bonus disputes, are recorded by independent complaints platforms rather than published by any regulator.

A complaint about Vave should go to Vave itself first, in writing, through the complaints channel it publishes or its support address where it publishes none, with every reply kept. If Vave does not resolve it, there is no regulator to escalate to, and in practice the pressure comes from the evidence your own records support. The sequence is set out in how to escalate a casino complaint.

What the licence requires

Vave's licence position could not be validated against the register, and no UK Gambling Commission licence is recorded for it, so GamStop and the UK dispute-resolution framework do not apply. Read more on why Costa Rica issues no gaming licence.

If you are trying to recover money

Because no licence this file could confirm now stands behind Vave, there is no adjudicator anywhere that can order a refund, so recovery runs as a claim built on the Vave terms as they stood when you played and on the evidence your own records support, taken forward with a regulated legal partner where they support it. Preserve your account evidence first, then see how gambling-loss recovery works, the evidence you need to recover losses, and how to escalate a casino complaint.

Before you write, look Vave up on the Curaçao enforcement register: a recorded action against the licensee changes what the complaint should say.

Vave sits outside the UK framework. For the wider picture, read getting money back from an offshore casino. If you self-excluded before Vave took your deposits, read getting money back after gambling on GamStop. For the escalation order that applies to Vave, licensed in Costa Rica, use the free complaint route finder.

If the amount is large

A five or six figure balance at Vave is handled differently from a small one, and the Curaçao rules explain why. Under the Gaming Authority’s anti-money-laundering regulations of January 2025, Vave must carry out customer due diligence once your financial transactions reach NAf 4,000, roughly £1,700 / $2,200, counted cumulatively across every deposit and withdrawal since you opened the Vave account rather than transaction by transaction. Where that threshold is crossed because you asked to withdraw, the regulations require Vave to freeze the account completely until your documents reach Vave. They also set a limit the other way: if Vave has not received the information within 30 days of the threshold being reached, it must end the Vave relationship, and where no presumption of money laundering exists the funds are to be transferred to you. Higher-risk Vave accounts attract enhanced due diligence, which is where the Vave requests for source of funds and source of wealth come from, covering savings, employment income, property sales, dividends, inheritances and earlier gambling winnings. The Vave commercial treatment usually shifts alongside the compliance one: the Vave host who answered within minutes goes quiet, and Vave withdrawal limits that never mattered on a £500 / $650 payout start to govern a £50,000 / $65,000 one. Where the Vave account is frozen, the escalation route is set out under Where you are playing from.

Where you are playing from

Wherever you are playing from, a dispute with Vave runs through the Vave Curaçao licence and seat. Under Article 5.3 of the LOK, the National Ordinance on Games of Chance, you can complain to Vave free of charge within six months of the incident; Vave must acknowledge within a week and rule within four weeks, extendable once by four weeks. If that fails, the LOK requires a licensee to offer alternative dispute resolution at its own expense, and the Curaçao Gaming Authority requires that provider to be one it has certified, on a timetable it expects to run no longer than 90 days from the referral. A licensee that has not engaged a certified provider has fallen short of that requirement rather than been released from it. The Authority does not mediate the Vave dispute or order compensation, but a complaint to complaints@cga.cw feeds its supervision of the Vave licence. Beyond that, Article 5.5 requires a licensee to provide a clause submitting the gaming agreement to Curaçao law and any dispute to the Curaçao courts, and Article 15.3 makes a player’s claim against a licensee such as Vave enforceable there.

The Vave licence could not be validated against the None. Costa Rica issues no gaming licence register, so treat the licence route as conditional on that licence existing; the domestic angles below stand either way.

If you are in the United States

No state regulator can take up a Vave dispute, because Vave holds no state licence and online gambling in the United States is regulated state by state, which leaves the Vave account outside every state system. The August 2025 letter from 50 state attorneys general asked the Department of Justice to pursue injunctions, seize domains and work with payment processors against offshore sites such as Vave; useful pressure, but not a refund route for a Vave player. Log the Vave dispute with your state attorney general or consumer protection office, then pursue the Curaçao route above against Vave.

If you are in the EU

The EU is not one answer on Vave. Austria: the Supreme Court (1 Ob 229/20p) treats contracts with a provider that has no Austrian concession as ineffective, with the stake repayable, which is the route an Austrian Vave player takes. Germany: the Court of Justice of the EU, Case C-440/23 (16 April 2026), confirmed that a consumer may claim restitution of stakes lost with an operator like Vave on games prohibited in Germany, on facts involving Malta-licensed operators rather than Vave; the Federal Court of Justice has designated I ZR 216/25 as its lead decision and the ruling is pending after a hearing on 17 September 2026, so a German Vave claim is not yet settled law. Netherlands: the Hoge Raad decided on 3 July 2026 that operating without a Dutch licence does not make the Vave gambling contract void, so a Dutch Vave player gets no automatic refund, only claims against Vave for mistake or in tort on their own facts. Nowhere else in the EU have we found a sourced domestic route against Vave; against Vave it is the Curaçao route above that applies.

If you are in Canada or Australia

Neither country offers a refund route against Vave. Canada: Ontario is the only province with a regulated private market, and its regulator and conduct body, the AGCO and iGaming Ontario, both say they cannot refund wagers or award compensation and deal only with Ontario-registered sites, not with Vave; the other provinces run monopolies and we have found no domestic route against Vave. Australia: the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 makes online casinos illegal to offer, ACMA takes complaints about breaches, and ACMA itself says Australian regulators cannot help if the provider withholds your Vave winnings and points you to the licensing authority abroad. Against Vave that is the Curaçao route above.

If you are in the UK

For a UK player the domestic framework simply does not reach Vave. It is illegal to provide gambling facilities to consumers in Great Britain without a Gambling Commission operating licence, wherever the operator sits, and Vave has none, so the Vave account was never inside that framework; but the Commission has no powers to resolve individual complaints or recover money from Vave, and its only ask is that unlicensed sites be reported to intelligencereports@gamblingcommission.gov.uk. Nor is there a UK adjudicator for a Vave dispute: the licence-condition ADR duty binds licensees only, and IBAS adjudicates only against operators registered with it. GAMSTOP covers GB-licensed operators alone, so a self-exclusion never blocked Vave. Your route against Vave is the Curaçao route above, the one attached to the Vave licence.

Sources

  1. vave.com: Operator Chestoption SRL, Costa Rica, cedula 3-102-876612; no gaming licence/regulator named (page undated) (previously recorded before 3 September 2026; read date not logged; not re-read on 6 September 2026)
  2. gamingcontrol.spin-cdn.com: Curaçao Gaming Authority register, v2 dataset, edition 3 September 2026, checked 6 September 2026 against the local file cga_register_2026-09-03_v2.csv: searched for Vave, Chestoption Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada and Chestoption SRL - no row found.
  3. acma.gov.au: ACMA formal warning naming Chestoption SRL / Vave (previously recorded before 3 September 2026; read date not logged; not re-read on 6 September 2026)

How we verified this: the Vave file draws on public licence registers and attributed player reports, checked as our editorial standards describe.

FAQ

Common questions about Vave

Can I get my money back from Vave?

Possibly. No licence this file could confirm now stands behind Vave, so there is no regulator or adjudicator anywhere that can order a refund. Recovery instead works through the Vave terms as they stood when you played, the evidence your payment history supports, and where appropriate a regulated legal partner. The right route depends on your evidence, and our initial assessment is free and confidential.

"Legit" is really three separate questions. Vave claims a Costa Rica licence that could not be validated against the register. 1 documented item sits on the Vave file above, it carrying an issuing body and source. No UK Gambling Commission licence is recorded for it, meaning neither GamStop nor the UK dispute framework reaches it, and that gap matters more than any review score when something goes wrong. No licence anywhere is a promise of fair treatment.

Vave is operated by Chestoption Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada. Vave's licence position could not be validated against the register check recorded on this file. It is recorded as listed on this file. This licence sits outside GamStop, so a GamStop self-exclusion does not block accounts held under it.

Vave is not open to UK players on the record on this file. T&Cs cl. 3.6 prohibit UK players; no Curaçao licence could be validated against the register on 6 September 2026; not UKGC-licensed. The licence in force when you played is what shapes the routes open to you.

Our research records 1 regulator or court action for Vave, with its issuing body and a source you can check. A listing is a record, not proof of wrongdoing, and every case turns on its own evidence.

Preserve the evidence first: screenshot your balance, the stuck withdrawal, chat transcripts and emails, and save the terms as they read today. Then make one formal written complaint and escalate to the right authority or a regulated legal partner. Avoid closing the account or accepting a partial settlement before you have taken advice.

No. Nothing is sent to any operator without your written consent. The first an operator hears of your case is a formal complaint you have approved.

Is Vave holding your money?

The sooner the evidence is preserved, the stronger the file. Our initial assessment is free and strictly confidential.

Start Your Claim
WhatsApp us